seniormeeting.co.uk
Senior Dating Sites Knowledge Base
where can I make money online promoting senior citizen dating sites? I'm looking for a good affiiate program or referral program that pays you to promote senior citizen dating sites.
Are there any FREE senior dating sites? Another point,ladies...please be truthful about your weight. for ex: Average usually means 20 pounds overweight. A "few extra pounds" usually could go to 40 pounds overweight and more. And the classic "more to love" means a person weighs in at 200 pounds and more.
why are disabled senior rejected on dating sites. when you are honest about your conditions ,i.m ambulatory? am a 77 old woman of color, I subcribe to several senior dating. I have been very up front about my condition as a stroke susvivor . Things go very well even after my explantion about my health challenges there seems a mutual interest. but suddenly, theseveral week;' suddenly there is a proplem ; I don't think you are the person that is right for me, etc. I have tried to anlalze the reasons. maybe my messages may be boring. I hesitate of encouring any disrespect or being to bold. Is it possible i'm too boring and my conversation is not interesting. I guess it is time for to face up the disable should not to date online
im looking for senior,prefferably greek,dating sites.? international are better but there are no domestic greeks there and i live in athens please help thank u xxx
Senior Citizens what do you think of the dating sites on line? Have you met someone through this new concept if so how did it turn out?
I would like to find Internet dating sites for seniors in Canada? People over 50-55 do not find matches on the regular dating sites, so if you know of any for the old boomerrs and young seniors here in Canada-Ottawa -please let me know.
Why dating sites are most for...? young people? are there any sites for senior or old people for dating and serious relationship? I'm 58 and looking for my soulmate.
Good dating sites for 17-18 year olds? Being single sucks, and the people I deal with at my high school (I'm a junior, gonna be a senior next year). Are there any good dating sites for 17-18 year olds? It'd be cool if they are: - LGBT-friendly - Nerd/geek-friendly - NOT full of members who're pro-marriage (I don't think marriage is for me) - Have the ability to block creepy people (Two sites I'm a member of don't have this :( ) Thanks
dating singles in Enid,Okla.? are there any dating sites for senior in Enid,Okla
Is "Carbon Dating" a good name for a dating site for seniors? ...don't bash me...I am not young
Seniors sites where are they? Am sick of teenies on dating sites so immature. Where are the mature older ppl?
Is AOL dating Senior Single for Real,these women say they live on the US on there profiles but 2 R from africa? I talked to 3 different women 2 were from california but in there emails they said that they were Africa, 1 woman from Indiana claimed she was in Nigeria,ones brother and farther were murdered so they fled to Africa,does this sound fishy,are there any good dating sites?
Are there dating sites for senior people? Do you know any good dating site for senior people? Thank you.
dating site with most seniors 55 plus looking for marriage? I am 64 and I am having a very hard time finding a mate.
Is it true that Obama has told many lies and nobody cares? Want a source? Read his books! Most of it is in there!
Equity analysts and associate analyst out there? I know this depends on the firm and the Senior Analyst, but what does a typical working day/week look like for you? How many hours per day and per week? Do you work weekends? If you work a ton of hours per week, can you work from home ever? How much travel? If you are married with or without kids, how often are they pissed for you missing dates, recitals, birthdays, etc? Any insight you can give would be great. I have found only three sites online that give this information, but I would like a larger sample size than three interviews.
give name of internet dating site that has the most seniors looking for a mate? I am 64 and not having any luck on okcupid which is free most on that site are under 25
9/11 Coincidences? The Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9/11 That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about. That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there's no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now! That Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions. That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves. That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama's brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things. That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is. That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations. The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations. That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task. That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time. That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America's Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA's entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all. That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar. That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration's energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate. That the standing order which covered the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11. That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace. That Dave Frasca of the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified. That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day. That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar. That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission. That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he'd taken to John Ashcroft's office specific warnings he'd learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack - even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets - and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper's pathetic need for attention. That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him. That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true. That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes from a disgruntled employee. That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared. The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House's calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq. That Afghanistan is once again the world's principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency. Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report. That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency. That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up. It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family. That FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate. Newsweek's report that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning. That George Bush's telephone logs for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day. That Mohamed Atta attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world, after all. That Lt Col Steve Butler, Vice Chancellor for student affairs of the Defense Language Institute during Alghamdi's terms, was disciplined, removed from his post and threatened with court martial when he wrote "Bush knew of the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. What is...contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain," is the least that should have happened for such disrespect shown his Commander in Chief. That Mohammed Atta dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be. That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta's flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled - the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida - was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are. That Hilliard's plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal's attorney before Seal's murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions. Reports of insider trading on 9/11 are false, because the SEC investigated and found only respectable investors who will remain nameless involved, and no terrorists, so the windfall profit-taking was merely, as ever, coincidental. That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it. That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it. That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything. That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind. The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media. That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 - one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings - and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence. That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing. That a recording made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers' describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo. That the FBI knew precisely which Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball. That a former flight school executive believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness, for the simple reason there is no conspiracy. That Jeb Bush was on board an aircraft that removed flight school records to Washington in the middle of the night on Sept 12th demonstrates how seriously the governor takes the issue of national security. To insinuate evil motive from the mercy flights of bin Laden family members and Saudi royals after 9/11 shows the sickness of the conspiratorial mindset. Le Figaro's report in October 2001, known to have originated with French intelligence, that the CIA met Osama bin Laden in a Dubai hospital in July 2001, proves again the perfidy of the French. That the tape in which bin Laden claims responsibility for the attacks was released by the State Department after having been found providentially by US forces in Afghanistan, and depicts a fattened Osama with a broader face and a flatter nose, proves Osama, and Osama alone, masterminded 9/11. That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be. That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies. Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true. That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America's emergency response. That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche. That the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only that appearances can be deceiving. That the Ames-strain anthrax was found to have originated at Fort Detrick, and was beyond the capability of all but a few labs to refine, underscores the importance of allowing the investigation to continue without the distraction of absurd conspiracy theories. That Republican guru Grover Norquist has been found to have aided financiers and supporters of Islamic terror to gain access to the Bush White House, and is a founder of the Islamic Institute, which the Treasury Department believes to be a source of funding for al Qaeda, suggests Norquist is at worst, naive, and at best, needs a wider circle of friends. That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts. That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway. That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest. That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is. That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise. That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her. That, when commenting on Edmond's case, Daniel Ellsberg remarked that Ashcroft could go to prison for his part in a cover-up, suggests Ellsberg is giving comfort to the terrorists, and could, if he doesn't wise up, find himself declared an enemy combatant. I could go on. And on and on. But I trust you get the point. Which is simply this: there are no secrets, an American government would never accept civilian casualties for geostrategic gain, and conspiracies are for the weak-minded and gullible. Here is where you can see this with links for every statement: http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html A good 9/11 truth movement website: http://truthmove.org/ What are your thoughts on these "coincidences"? What is the "Cole's Notes version"?
Is there a (free) dating site to link younger people with older people? this is a little embarassing...see, when it comes to dating i've been burned by girls my own age. Also recently I had a somewhat romantic relationship with someone 20 years my senior - and we really hit it off! We had a lot in common, liked the same activities, and liked each other. Sadly that had to end because the college class we were attending ended, and we haven't seen much of each other since. But I found that I really liked the idea of, well, romance with someone my senior for various reasons...and was wondering if there was a site that specifically is for that kind of interest? Preferably it would be free (to some degree). Is there any such thing?
gf who swears she loves me wants a break for a little? I know this is the typical "break" question. But ive read a ton of them on this site. we are both 19 years old, freshman in college. We started dating Senior year in highschool, and have been dating for a lil over a year. We are always perfect together. and honest with each other. We didnt have a falling out, or feel like we were fading apart. A week ago she said how much she missed me and cant wait to see me. She texts me all the time and calls and says i love you as much as possible, but after we hung out, had a great time, even had sex... she later says she wants a break. She claims it has nothing to do with me, and that shes not interested in other guys, and doesnt want a relationship. She said " i want to try again with you but right now ive just been so uncertain about myself the past few weeks, about everything. I dont know about school, about my life, about my major, about us even. so i need to figure myself out first then we can try again" Should i just give her space, or like keep a casual relationship just hanging out every once in a while, like once a week in the summer and until then not at all since we goto different colleges. or should i just assume shes not going to want to get back together. Up until last week she wrote me cards and always said that we are gonna be together forever. im very confused so far all your answers have been great! thank you. i am optomistic about us, as long as i give her the space, and just once in a while we talk just to stay in touch. i think you are all right, i'll have a hard time picking the best answer haha
Whats the site where you can make a little person and they can go to school and stuff? Does anyone know this site where you can make yourself (and others) and you go to school and interact with the other people? They like date each other and stuff and kinda do it on there own i think! I saw some of my classmates from a computer class when i was a senior in high school playing it and i cant remember the site! LOL
People2people.com Review Personals Online - Who Knows? I was looking for an online seniors dating site and saw www.people2people.com advertising. Do you feel it is a rip-off or is it for real?
Calling from a Mobile in another country? I have a mobile Sagem C4-2. Am going to the States soon and have checked to see if I can use. I have checked with the T Mobile web site (which I am on) and according to them it says I can use. I have also checked with the T Mobile shop locally and then say no. Am at a complete loss and as I am not very up to date on anything technical (am a Senior) can someone please help. Many thanks
this girl at my school 1m 19 and ah senior but this freshman i really like her but shes dating someone? this girl at my school 1m 19 and ah senior but this freshman i really like her but shes dating someone but everytime she sees me in the hall she will look at me and give me the biggest smile and follow me with her eyes till im outa site lol i just wondering if she likes me or maybe thanks im really cute but no farther cause shes with someone or maybe im just on crack haha no not on that no more but anyways ....
Any single or divorced seniors? Have you tried a site like this: http://www.seniorocity.com/groups_browse.php?categID=24&nf=1 I'm curious if you've had any more luck with an online community like seniorocity (where there are people with various interests, ie, a community about more than just about dating). Or have you gone with a traditional online dating site?
Seniors tell me? whats your opinion on ppl hooking up via the internet dating sites? given the opportunity to do it when you were younger, would you have? how safe do you think it is? or maybe youve done it?
Why would a woman do this? Right, I'm 29, and Ive been dating a woman, same age, I met online on a dating site. To give you a brief background she was engaged to be married to an Australian guy(16 years her senior!). They split up just over a year ago as he called the wedding off and she flew back to Scotland. She's been out with guys since then. Anyway, things have been going great, and if anything, she's been doing the chasing, e.g. she said she didn't want us to see other people, she holds my hand, we've kissed, etc. Then the last time we saw each other we ended up going further and we had sex. Well I thought everything was fine. However, after not receiving calls/texts I had a strange feeling something was up. Well we just spoke on the phone tonight and she's basically said that she's realised that she doesnt think she is over the Australian guy(Mark). However, she went out for 5-6 months with a guy since she split up with him! And after 6 weeks she splits with me. She also says she really fancies me. She genuinely wants to keep seeing me and I've agreed to see her 2moro night, going to the cinema, bite to eat, probably a couple of glasses of wine at her place.When we spoke a few hours ago on the phone she said that the funny thing is she REALLY likes me. She said she thinks Im great and shes told me things she hasnt told a lot of other people.Plus the fact she said she really fancies me so it's not as if she doesnt see me in THAT way, like I feared.AND she wants to see me 2moro night. Its doing my head in.Is it some sort of test.Is she just wanting drama?I would love your opinions girls....it just seems that things were fine before the sex. I should have mentioned that she said she just wants to be friends, but in the same breath she said she really fancies me???
Single senior men 63 & older are you really looking for a good woman? You gentlemen on these dating sites are you really looking for a woman to share your life with or you just looking at pictures and profiles to pass your day away?
Is there a sight for seniors 55+ just to make friends, not a dating service? There are many of us seniors who are widowed or divorced who would just like to have a e-mail pals. Many are of low income, have no family and are homebound. This would provide some contact with the outside world and give many some meaning and worth. Even those who have more means and would like just to communicate with others from different areas, who do not want to put themselves out there in the dating scene, put their life and photo on the internet to who knows who. Let us have are dignity back and be who we are and offer friendship and be able to feel free and safe doing so from our own homes. Surely there must be something, if not How could a site be set up specificly for this
Pen Pal Sites? Aren't there any pen pal sites that are just that? Don't want one for dating, I am semi retired, and bored out of my mind. I just want to find a few people my age, simular interests, etc. just to write to. Do you other seniors remember writing (and) recieving letters. Wasn't that fun?
Do you think on line dating for seniors is safe? I am on a few sites and I find older men fit into three boxes? Become a preacher{minister} looking for a purse or a player? and what is your views on this subject? {On Line Dating?}
laptops for senior students in Australia? i have heard news about the laptops being given to every senior student in Australian secondary schools but nothing solid about the date that they will be issued and what kind of laptop they will be etc. so if anyone has any news or a site with solid news please answer this question XD
Do you beleive in? I found true unconditional love on a dating site,not really looking for it,I have been single most my life and 45 yrs old,I never thought things like this happened online,well,I found a needle in a haystack,we have been together almost a year and he is 15 yrs my senior,but,can't tell he is 60!he acts like a 45 year old and we have a blast together,he flys 900 miles to see me and we are on the phone all through our days!so,now,Do you beleive in finding love online?......I DO COZ I HAVE!!!
Why is True.com scamming the paid members by using spoofed profiles and phoney winks and employee e-mails? True.com's CEO is a multi-millionaire.Why is he running a scam dating site? Defrauding SENIOR CITIZENS carries extra penalties.Claiming endorsement by PSYCHOLOGY TODAY is a lie (already checked with them). "Background checks" is another lie.Anyone with a credit card can become a paid member at True.com <CAC@OAG.STATE.TX.US> is where to report this FRAUD and if enough people complain,maybe True.com will get busted.
Should I take him back? I've been seriously dating a coworker (20 years my senior) for about 9 months now. For the first 6 months, our relationship was amazing; I have never felt this depth of love or chemistry with anyone else. Our relationship became rocky over the holidays, and we began fighting regularly. A week ago, he began to accuse me of infidelity when I told him I needed to take some space. This prompted me to wonder why he would ask (people in glass houses...). I did some internet snooping (which I should not have done, I realize) and found out that he had been emailing women on an online dating site. I mean, I found about 35 emails from him asking to meet these people, telling them details about himself (even where he lives) and that he "had been with another woman but it wasn't working out." After I pushed more, he confessed that he had gone out for "a drink" with one of these women (the day after he told me he wanted to take a break from us) and lied to me about it. This truly broke me heart. I feel so betrayed. I confronted him about this, and told him how badly he had broken my heart. He at first got mad at me for invading his privacy and tried to justify what he'd done by saying that I had made him so unhappy that he didn't know if he should commit to me. After several heated phone conversations about all this, I told him we were over. Last night, I received 15 text messages begging me to give him another chance. He also called me at 1:00 am crying hysterically and begging for me to take him back (telling me how much he loves me, how sorry he was for hurting me, how foolish he was, and that he felt as if he'd lost his best friend). I still love this man, and my first instinct is to go back to him. All my closest friends are telling me not to, but I don't know what to do. He really, really hurt me, but in my heart I feel like he is "the one." I need some objective opinions on this. Please help. And I should mention that he is a very successful litigator. Crying and begging are not things he really ever does. He's also in the process of finishing a divorce (from someone who cheated on him). Lastly, he claims he never had any physical or telephonic conversations with any of these match.com women. Please, please give me some input everyone. I'm very confused and want to try and make the best decision. Need objective perspectives.
Does this scare you? Republicans registering as Obama democrats with the intention to unseat Clinton? http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/yankinulster/gGBrH7 Wolf and other non readers of the article. The source of the article is Obama's Campaign. If you click the link it goes right through. Obama is PROUD of bamboozling the system--are you going to continue to be bamboozled?
How do i Get to know the soon to be father of my child all over again?After a rocky history? Okay my ex.bf was my first bf (kiss ect.)we met our senior year of highschool i was 17 going on 18 and he was 16 going on 17(funny b-day) from another school. He came to dance as one of my friends dates(he was her ex.bf).It was love at first site we had a instantly eyes locked he came over instantly started flirting.Within 24 hrs we were dating we went through hell with my friend who was his ex.gf she spread horrible rumors about me.I got pregnant we broke up and got back together only to break up again(he liked another girl)and i miscarried the baby.Tried to stay friend later his new gf did not like me though and he sent me a message saying he never wanted to see me again.Six months later he came looking for me we started a fling(his relationship ifie and i was on rebound) that lasted 2.5 yrs.I met my hubby started dating him we got engaged but took 4 month break before the wedding.I had one last fling with my ex.bf and now have a son on way.He wants to see if we can try dating again? P.S I got married unaware i was carring ex.bf child and am getting a divorce from hubby.Parents never approved of my ex.bf because they felt he was lower class so i never took him seriously till now?I am confused unsure of my feelings? I dated my hubby 1.5yrs and truly thought i was over my ex.bf!
Would online dating make me look desperate? I'm 19 right now and going to be a college senior this fall. I've dated in college and it royally sucks. I can't hold a relationship longer than 2 months...and the girls always claim "it's not you, it's me". Then they run off partying and screwing around with other guys and will probably eventually become one of the "all men are dicks" kinda people 2 or 3 years from now. Worst part is the girls my age are 1 or 2 years below me and the girls in my class year are either taken or not of interesting to me (usually the latter). So over the summer, I want to try meeting girls that live around my hometown that I can relate with...and I've pretty much ruled out all girls from my high school or any past girlfriends. But would it be pathetic or seem desperate for me to use an online matchmaking site? Help, please. Thanks!
Where to find guys age 20 - 25? I'm a 19 year old lady and want to know how to find a man! I live in a small city / town Pahrump, Nevada with 30,000 people. I work in a law office. A lot of seniors live here. 1/3 (10,000) people are veterans. When I'm somewhere I only see children, teenagers, middle age and senior people. I seldom see any people who are in there 20s. I looked at Internet dating sites, but there are not a lot of people. Most of them don't seem nice. I want to find guys who are about 20 - 25. There is only a bowling center and a skating zone. But there are only teenagers. I'm too young for pubs and casinos. I didn't find a discotheque here. This problem is driving me crazy. I'm a woman and want to meet men! I'm a nice, attractive and smart woman. I don't want to waist my young life without being in love. Does anybody know how I can find that kind of guys?
Im planning a health awareness fair for senior citizens help!? ok so i have flu vaccines being given out and we will make posters and pamphlets but we want to make a trivia game or jeopardy something they will enjoy. The date is this monday so were really running behind but we need ideas!! and i cant find a site with jeopardy questions. Please just help us out we are 16 doing our gold award project for this. There will be about 100 seniors thank you!
Where can I rent luxury or sports cars in South Florida? My younger brother is going to his Senior prom in May, and I am looking for a sports car or luxury car to drive him in for the night. Does anybody know where, and the rates for any good places in South Florida? I have checked sites like Avis, Budget, Hertz, but they will not show their fleet, or guarantee that they will have a nice car for that date. I am in Davie, I'm willing to travel to the Miami area as well. Thanks!!
If her parents catch us having sex, can they file any charges against me? Iam 17, shes 15. Live in Florida. (dont answer this question if you gonna tell me im a rapist or such (a high school senior dating a high school sophomore is normal nowadays.), or if you are gonna call me any names. **I dont need advice** Links to a Florida law site showing me what i need wins you best answer. : )
Gay dating in HighSchool? 1st off, im 17 and ending my junior year next week, woo senior year is so close!! haa anyways I have just started comming out to close friends and family within the past month. Ok well I want to start dating guys who live by me, but there are only a few gay guys (who are out at least) and Im not even friends with them (not that I dont like them, I just dont really know them) anyways is there like any good (without the freaky pedos & what not) sites were I could find local guys? I live in the chicago burbs if that matters any.. Also, once I do start dating guys.. Im really nervous just thinking about it because, even though I really want to, It is going to be so new and strange for me.. so pretty much any 1st time gay dating advice you can give me would really be awesome haha!! thanks :)
i feel totally pathetic. can someone help? I'm fifteen, sophomore female, suburbanite, bored with the heck out of this town i live in. I go to a fairly small high school (with no senior class) and about 900 kids. I love my current friends (some) and life's just fine, if it weren't for these three problems: 1. This one girl who I shall call "Leah". Leah, in my opinion, is smarter, prettier, and much more popular than me. The only thing I have against her is that I'm way nicer than her, not to be conceited or anything (but it's totally true, you'll see why in a few words). She used to be my best friend in middle school, but high school has changed us and we suddenly stopped being friends. She's gotten more popular through playing basketball with a couple of guys she met online (Facebook, not dating sites) and were introduced to by mutual friends. One of her newfound bball friends, who doesn't go to our school, is someone I find cute, and word got out that I thought so. Apparently it came out the wrong way and everyone now thinks I like him - even he knows. She then proceeded to talk trash about me, and I'm not sure exactly what, but apparently she is plotting to "bring me down". Why would she ever do this? I have never done anything to her, seriously. What do you propose a girl like herself's ulterior motive is? Honestly, I want to become friends with her again, just for the sake of our uncomfortable relationship. We're family friends so not seeing each other just doesn't work. It's actually her bday soon and I was thinking of getting her a present to her favorite store. Is this a good move? 2. COLLEGE! Yeah, I'm only in high school, but people have been telling me I can't go to the college of my choice. I had a 4.0 GPA last year, as well as this year. This year I'm taking 1 AP and 1 Honors class I find challenging. I got B's in both of them and A's in everything else. Adults, including my parents, are telling me "tough luck" when I tell them I want to go to Syracuse, USC, or Northwestern for journalism. I feel terrible when they do this, since my friends all get 4.5 GPAs. How should I deal? 3. My two closest friends at school have boyfriends they are very close to, 6 months - 1 year in going out. Their boyfriends are best friends and my two closest friends are as well. They spend a lot of time together at school - lunches, brunches, etc. - and often leave no time for anything else. The two boyfriends don't even bother getting to know me and I'm sick of it. My two friends are now not talking to me and whispering in their own little world. They still invite me to their double dates, but I end up getting excluded. I love my two friends dearly and I do not wish to lose them, but because of their boyfriends, I have. What should I do? Confront them? Thanks for helping. :]
+75 yrs old mateure persons seeking romance fun. helping web sites please? persons +75 seeking romance fun or dating on line which web sits are helpful for seniors
Do you believe in coincidences? The Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9/11 That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about. That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there's no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now! That Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions. That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves. That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama's brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things. That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is. That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations. The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations. That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task. That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time. That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America's Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA's entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all. That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar. That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration's energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate. That the standing order which covered the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11. That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace. That Dave Frasca of the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified. That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day. That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar. That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission. That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he'd taken to John Ashcroft's office specific warnings he'd learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack - even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets - and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper's pathetic need for attention. That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him. That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true. That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes from a disgruntled employee. That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared. The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House's calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq. That Afghanistan is once again the world's principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency. Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report. That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency. That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up. It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family. That FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate. Newsweek's report that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning. That George Bush's telephone logs for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day. That Mohamed Atta attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world, after all. That Lt Col Steve Butler, Vice Chancellor for student affairs of the Defense Language Institute during Alghamdi's terms, was disciplined, removed from his post and threatened with court martial when he wrote "Bush knew of the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. What is...contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain," is the least that should have happened for such disrespect shown his Commander in Chief. That Mohammed Atta dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be. That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta's flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled - the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida - was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are. That Hilliard's plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal's attorney before Seal's murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions. Reports of insider trading on 9/11 are false, because the SEC investigated and found only respectable investors who will remain nameless involved, and no terrorists, so the windfall profit-taking was merely, as ever, coincidental. That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it. That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it. That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything. That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind. The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media. That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 - one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings - and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence. That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing. That a recording made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers' describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo. That the FBI knew precisely which Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball. That a former flight school executive believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness, for the simple reason there is no conspiracy. That Jeb Bush was on board an aircraft that removed flight school records to Washington in the middle of the night on Sept 12th demonstrates how seriously the governor takes the issue of national security. To insinuate evil motive from the mercy flights of bin Laden family members and Saudi royals after 9/11 shows the sickness of the conspiratorial mindset. Le Figaro's report in October 2001, known to have originated with French intelligence, that the CIA met Osama bin Laden in a Dubai hospital in July 2001, proves again the perfidy of the French. That the tape in which bin Laden claims responsibility for the attacks was released by the State Department after having been found providentially by US forces in Afghanistan, and depicts a fattened Osama with a broader face and a flatter nose, proves Osama, and Osama alone, masterminded 9/11. That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be. That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies. Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true. That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America's emergency response. That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche. That the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only that appearances can be deceiving. That the Ames-strain anthrax was found to have originated at Fort Detrick, and was beyond the capability of all but a few labs to refine, underscores the importance of allowing the investigation to continue without the distraction of absurd conspiracy theories. That Republican guru Grover Norquist has been found to have aided financiers and supporters of Islamic terror to gain access to the Bush White House, and is a founder of the Islamic Institute, which the Treasury Department believes to be a source of funding for al Qaeda, suggests Norquist is at worst, naive, and at best, needs a wider circle of friends. That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts. That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway. That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest. That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is. That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise. That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her. That, when commenting on Edmond's case, Daniel Ellsberg remarked that Ashcroft could go to prison for his part in a cover-up, suggests Ellsberg is giving comfort to the terrorists, and could, if he doesn't wise up, find himself declared an enemy combatant. I could go on. And on and on. But I trust you get the point. Which is simply this: there are no secrets, an American government would never accept civilian casualties for geostrategic gain, and conspiracies are for the weak-minded and gullible. go to http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html for links for every statement made here. http://truthmove.org
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
